Government Ethics and Transparency

Conflicts of Interest

There are several party leaders in our state that are also paid lobbyists representing special interests in the legislature.  There are also some legislators who are lawyers representing special interests affected by issues, for example warehouse development, that may be under consideration by the legislature.  These are conflicts of interest.

Officials at all  levels of Government and party officials must never be in a position to profit personally from their positions of public trust.

Transparency in Government

Voters must be certain that their governments are operating legally and solely in the public interest.

Electoral law violations are subject to a two year statute of limitations.  It used to be ten years.  This change was part of the Elections Transparency Act, passed in April of 2023.  This is too short to permit proper investigation of electoral law violations.

The Open Public Records Act (OPRA) law was modified to eliminate fee shifting.  This raises the risk to a citizen in suing to get a government to fulfill an OPRA request.

The Elections Transparency Act gutted important ethical boundaries surrounding the amount of money government contractors could donate (pay to play laws.)  It also permitted the funding of “phantom candidates” that are used to siphon off voters from legitimate candidates. This is a cynical play to take advantage of our plurality voting process.  (It would be resolved under (Ranked-Choice voting!)

This position is intended to mirror the Government Reform platform outlined by candidate Steven Fulop.  Where an element of that reform platform is not mentioned here, it is Mr. Barratt’s intent to adopt the position taken by Mr. Fulop.

 Help me support Steve Fulop to make that happen.